There is an equipotential increase of 100 V/m above the surface of the earth, the only way that can be replicated or accomplished in any way is that you have to have two gaussian surfaces. You have to have a surface above and a surface below to get that equipotential increase.

The conductivity of the air due to the drifting of ions also increases rapidly with altitude—for two reasons. First of all, the ionization from cosmic rays increases with altitude. Secondly, as the density of air goes down, the mean free path of the ions increases, so that they can travel farther in the electric field before they have a collision—resulting in a rapid increase of conductivity as one goes up.

Witsit solving the problem with Newtons Laws

You guys really don't understand physics, like at all. Have him use that formula to calculate the escape velocity of earth, orbiting trajectories of satellites and planets or heck even the acceleration at say 50 miles up. Won't work, but guess what , Newtons law of gravity will. You need a force equation on the other side of ma. Witsit does not seem to get that. From that force equation you can set it equal to ma and get a differential equation that will predict the motion of the object at any height, any orbit any location etc. The problem is Witsit is trying to rebrand gravity and say it is electrostatics when in reality he is just using Newton's law of gravity at the surface of the earth. Electrostatics is coulombs law (in potential form to get V/m) in which you set ma = qE you get an equation but you can NEVER get gravity for it. You know why? Because the electrostatics acceleration depends on mass, gravity does not (because gravitational mass = inertial mass , which was the insight that led to General Relativity).

You guys really don't understand physics, like at all. Have him use that formula to calculate the escape velocity of earth, orbiting trajectories of satellites and planets or heck even the acceleration at say 50 miles up. Won't work, but guess what , Newtons law of gravity will. You need a force equation on the other side of ma. Witsit does not seem to get that. From that force equation you can set it equal to ma and get a differential equation that will predict the motion of the object at any height, any orbit any location etc. The problem is Witsit is trying to rebrand gravity and say it is electrostatics when in reality he is just using Newton's law of gravity at the surface of the earth. Electrostatics is coulombs law (in potential form to get V/m) in which you set ma = qE you get an equation but you can NEVER get gravity for it. You know why? Because the electrostatics acceleration depends on mass, gravity does not (because gravitational mass = inertial mass , which was the insight that led to General Relativity).

**Satellites and Technology**

Axiological Analysis

To travel to space we need to know the earth is a sphere (not that we find out from space)

Satellites orbiting earth only make sense on spherical earth

Satellite Watching

GPS factors in gravity and speed (time dilation due to spherical earth).

Planes correct for atmosphere to stay above earth.

Nikola Tesla had his images of earth in his experiments as a sphere

2 Types of Balloon Satellites (regular high alt ballons and actual satellites inflated gas.)

Stanford Linear Accelerator Curvature

michelson-morley experiment

Conspiracy

Too many would have to be in on it.

ISS - 248